Skip to main content Jump to sidebar
MAK

Full text : Perlen aus Gablonz

sorted  according  to  numbers  (Harzer  1851,  pp.  350-352).  From  the  material  presented
here,  it  is  easy  to  see  that  although  number  Systems  -  including  some  with  multiple  zeroes  -
were  common,  they  were  anything  but  uniform  or  universal.  Bead  guages  must  have
deviated  from  one  another,  too,  as  the  different  measuring  results  shown  on  the  charts  of
Unger  for  faceted  beads  and  blown  beads  prove.
BUNDLES,  BUNCHES,  THREADS,  STRINGS
The  commercial  units  for  beads  (amount  or  weight)  were  determined  by  various  criteria,  but
chiefly  by  their  size  or  their  value.  Keess  gives  the  pound  as  the  weight  unit  for  two  types  of
Venetian  beads.  Sizes,  too,  were  differentiated:  “collane  (margherite)”  and  “conterie’’('/2,  3,
4  and  5  pound  units)  (Keess  2/1823,  p.  899).  The  differences  in  bead  weights  depended  on
the  metal  content:  the  yellows  were  the  heaviest  (1  bunch  with  10  strings  =  95  grains),  the
pale  blues  the  lightest  (55  grains)  (Altmütter  1841,  p.  92).
Real  pearls  were  often  sorted  according  to  weight:  the  pearl  measuring  device  was  a  thin
piece  of  brass  with  round  holes  “of  different,  gradually  decreasing  sizes;  they  were  shaped
so  that,  for  instance,  one  hole  would  pass  a  pearl  of  exacty  %  carat,  the  next  one  a  pearl  of
y 2 ,  then  from  3 U,  1,  1  'U,  1  'h  carat,  etc...  ’’  (Altmütter  1841,  p.  73).  In  the  crafts  publications
from  the  historicism  period  there  is  frequent  mention  of  pound  beads.
Generally  speaking,  beads  characterized  neither  by  unusual  size  nor  value  were  sold  by
bundles  (1  bündle  =  2  bunches,  1  bunch  =  12  strings,  1  string  =  50  beads),  which  contained
100dozen  beads  (=  1200  beads)  (Tayenthal  1900,  p.  24;  Winter  1900,  p.  20;  Zenkner
1983,  p.  110).  Depending  on  regional  practices,  expressions  could  also  vary:  we  sometimes
find  the  terms  thread  and  string  interchanged.  The  bündle  (=  1200  beads)  was  already
common  as  a  pricing  or  sales  unit  during  the  Biedermeier  period  (Prag  1831,  record,  p.  58,
no.  1288).  The  unusual  size  of  some  beads,  their  value  or  a  particular  customer  wish  were
often  the  reason  for  a  kind  of  stringing  that  differed  from  the  usual  norm  of  the  bündle
(=  1200  beads).  Schänder  gives  the  following  details  for  the  expensive  real  gold  beads:
“Strings  of  25  or  50  beads,  or  the  well-known  38  cm  length,  or  the  also  well  known  string  of  drops
holding  15  beads  with  each  side  ending  with  an  end-drop.  According  to  regulation,  10  or  12  or
15  strings  are  then  bound  together,  that  means  both  ends  are  tied  off  and  that  is  1  bunch.  Again,
the  gold  beads  are  an  exception;  whereas  the  bunch  ofsilvered  beads  is  finished,  the  gold  bead
bunch  is  tied  on  both  ends  with  braid-silk,  usually  green"  (Schänder  n.d.,  p.  9).
So  far  I  have  found  the  bunch  used  much  more  often  than  the  bündle  as  a  commercial  unit
in  Contemporary  (Bazar)  and  other  sources.  We  do  not  know  with  any  certainty  how  many
beads  were  contained  in  these  bunches,  since  the  bunch  can  sometimes  hold  a  different
number  of  beads:  at  the  Munich  exhibition  in  1854,  Fischer’s  bunch  (“Masch”)  held  1200
beads;  at  Hermann,  1  bunch  (“Masche”)  of  larger  beads  contained  100  pieces,  for  smaller
beads,  the  amount  was  1000  for  1  bunch  (Munich  1854,  report  1855,  p.  47).
VENICE  AND  MURANO
The  following  numbers  have  been  handed  down  for  the  small  strung  Venetian  beads:  With
differences  depending  on  size  and  weight,  one  bündle  (a  “mazza”)  contains  12  bunches,
each  bunch  contains  10  strings  or  Strands  (1  bündle  =  120  strings).  A  bündle  could
therefore  contain  up  to  22,000  single  beads  (Altmütter  1841,  p.  92).  Contemporary
information  is  frequently  very  general.  This  is  also  true  of  Bussolin  who  points  to  bundles
(“masses”)  of  various  dimensions  depending  on  the  quality  and  size  of  the  beads,  and
mentions  that  the  embroidery  beads  are  strung  into  bundles  of  120  strings,  each  of  which  is
5  inches  long  (Bussolin  1847,  p.  25:  “les  margaritines  ä  broder  sont  enfilees  en  masses  de
cent  et  vingt  fils  de  cinq  pouces  de  longueur”).
Zanetti  only  talks  of  bundles;  these  consist  of  a  varying  number  of  strings  depending  on  the
type  of  the  wares  and  whether  they  are  longer  or  shorter  (Zanetti  1874,  pp.  131,  132.
donne  e  piccole  ragazze  ...  facentone  matasse,mazzi,  dozzine  composte  di  piü  o  meno  fili
piü  o  meno  lunghi  secondo  il  genere  della  merce  e  le  ordinazioni”).

104
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.