AMERICAN P RE FACE.
xxxviii
NO HISTORIC ANTAGONISM BETWEEN FINE ART AND INDUSTRIAL ART.
No broad and clear-cut distinction can be made between fine
art, and art as applied to industry, such as will enable one to say,
all upon this side belongs to fine art, all upon that to industrial
art. It is true that in certain' particulars they difler decidedly;
but in others they as decidedly agree. It is witli them as with
poetry and prose, with speaking and singing, with pure geometry
and geometry as applied to mechanics. It is no degradation of
art, as the same thing is no degradation of geometry, to make it
subserve the cause of industry ; that is only making art perform a
portion of its legitimate work. History shows that the periods
which have been especially distinguished for achievements in fine
art have also been especially distinguished for applications of art
to industry. Recent times furnish an illustration of this fact in
the case of France. Of her art it may be most emphatically said,
that it rests upon an industrial basis ; yet where has fine art flour-
islied better during the last hundred years ? Again, many of
those familiär with the individual lives of the great masters know
that many of them began their studies and their work with art
applied to manufactures. From this industrial basis they ad-
vanced to painting and statuary, to the representation of intelli-
gence, of spirit, of beauty in its highest form. Nor did the great
artists of former ages tliink it beneath their dignity, unworthy
their powers, to devote a part of their time, even in the height of
their renown, to making designs for industrial purposes. They were
in sympathy with the working world around them. These historical
facts are enough in themselves to show that there is no antagonism
between fine art, and art applied to industry. A rational consid-
eration of the matter, showing that the two have many teachable
things in common, only confirms the verdict of history.
ART NOT A MERE MATTER OF FEELING, BUT TEACHABLE.
Every teachable thing must have an indisputable basis of fact
and reason. It is utterly vain to attempt to formulate and teach
what is a mere matter of vague, undefinable feeling; for when the
best has been done there is always need to “ explain the explana-
tion.” Ilence it is that those who regard art mainly or wholly as